#CharacterCounts

Pillar: Trustworthiness

Purpose: Provide students an opportunity to review the parallels between trustworthiness and loyalty.

Objectives:

  • Students will discuss trustworthy people as a group
  • Students will listen to / read a story about trust
  • Students will reflect and answer questions about trust based on the story
  • Students will brainstorm ways to earn trust

Discussion: How are trustworthiness and loyalty the same? Different?

Activity:

  • Tell the students that you are going to read them a short story and then ask them questions about trust based on the story. Advise them that loyalty and honesty sometimes conflict. Tell them to think about this as they listen to the story. Read “A Public Scene with Eugene,” and tell them that this story shows how doing the right thing isn’t always easy.
  • Read aloud story “A Public Scene with Eugene”
  • Discussion
    • What would be the most trustworthy thing for Eugene’s boss to do at this stage?
    • It’s been said there are two types of loyalty: “dog loyalty,” and “cat loyalty.” The first kind is about being loyal only to your master; the second means being loyal to the house. How does this relate to the story? Is one kind of loyalty more trustworthy than the other?
    • What could the townspeople do to uncover the truth and reach a fair solution?
    • After hearing Eugene’s explanation do you think the townspeople admired Eugene for doing the right thing?
    • Should employees be loyal to their companies? How far should this go?
    • What would you say to Eugene?
      • Extension- Write a letter to Eugene giving him advice.
    • What would be the most trustworthy thing for the president of Sawmill to do?

A Public Scene with Eugene

The local townspeople could hardly believe the rumor that Eugene was going to testify against his boss. Mr. McGee, the owner of a large nearby tobacco plantation. The other farmers in town liked Mr. McGee, and since Eugene helped manage the operation, they were perplexed at how the young man could betray his boss.

Eugene, who found himself surrounded on the steps of the county courthouse, tried to explain his position to the small, angry crowd of townspeople.

“Friends, I’m not a lawyer, but I do know this: if a man is guilty, his lawyer is likely to defend him as though he were innocent. And the prosecuting attorney, on the other hand, usually seeks to convince the jury that the defendant is guilty no matter what. So, justice often depends on witnesses who will come forward like good citizens and tell the truth.”

“We know that,” said a man in faded overalls, “but what’s that got to do with testifying against McGee? He is a good man and has helped this town in many ways.  You should be defending him. You wouldn’t have a paycheck if it weren’t for him.”

“You’re right in some respects,” Eugene responded. “Mr. McGee is a good man in many ways. He pays fair wages to his workers. For years he has taken good care of his migrant tenants who return each year to work for him. But as you probably know several of the field hands got sick and one died. The hospital report indicated that all of them had been poisoned. The police said one of the wells from which the workers drank was polluted with toxic chemicals.

“Mr. McGee hired an engineer to test the well. The engineer confirmed that it was polluted and ensured us it was result of toxic runoff from Sawmill, a textile company three miles upstream from the farm.

A woman in the crowd shouted, “Sure, they got their reports. You don’t have to tighten the rope around McGee’s neck. Plus, it isn’t Sawmill that’s on trial- it’s just poor ol’ McGee.”

Eugene continued. “When Mr. McGee and I approached Sawmill about this several months ago, they insisted they had not violated any environmental regulations and that the contamination must have come from somewhere else. But when I suggested going to the Environmental Protection Agency, Mr. McGee told me he would handle it.”

Eugene shifted his weight on the steps. Above him, framed between two white Doric columns, was an engraving which read, “Hall of Justice.” He paused for a moment, then said, “I’m going to tell the truth. That’s the only way we can find justice.”

“I supposed you mean well,” said the man, “but you’re just plain stupid. A man’s duty’s is to his company. I that is who allows you to put food on your family’s table, you like to help them. You don’t join the prosecution.”

“The truth is that we all knew Well #4 was contaminated,” Eugene explained. “But the real reason I feel I have to testify against my boss is that I discovered he has taken a lot of money from Sawmill in exchange for promising not to report them to the E.P.A.”

The crowd gasped.

“Mr. McGee told the workers not to drink from that well. Still, that’s not enough. If he were a trustworthy man with real integrity, he would not have taken Sawmill’s bribe, and he would have had something done about the contamination. I feel partly responsible for not contacting the proper authorities on my own. Hopefully, this case will help prevent future tragedies and provide a record for us to hold Sawmill accountable. They certainly bear responsibility for this tragedy too.”
The group was left speechless as Eugene made his way up the courthouse steps.

 

Need more lessons like this?  Check out the Good Ideas Book from our online store.

6-8 lesson: trustworthiness and loyalty
Tagged on:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *